The SPLC
Well, it is February so I figure that it is time to post about the celebration of black America. For the most part, I don't have a big problem with black history month. I think that it is pretty uneventful. It is pushed as a sort of secular liturgical moment, but no one really feels that it is anything deeper than an advertisement for 20th c. revolutionaries.
I am not black and never really identified with blacks all that much as a child and certainly never ever wanted to become a baptist preacher or rapper. (See Qahal for X-Dash merch). So for me, it is kind of an annoyance that there is all this talk about being black where I could easily spout off 100 facts regarding my particular Western European heritage that includes religious persecution under Bismark, nobility and title, Catholic orthodoxy, etc... that pound for pound outrivals anything I have ever heard come from black America. But that really isn't a problem because some of us have learned to deal with this phenomena from an early age. (I once was slated to wrestle a girl in high school but after I hurt another male opponent by wrenching his wrist, she forfeited, I was relieved).
Now in Indianapolis, the North of the north, I am constantly surrounded by attempts of people to make me aware that there are black people around me and that they are distinct. Fine, I see that and I notice them every time I go to work. I work with them and enjoy a collegial and friendly atmosphere of which many different races are a part. Things are fine, there is no elephant in the room.
Now, I won't go into the idiocy of the liberal education establishment to push white guilt to the point of totally obfuscating the serious moral depravity of a person like King. That is an either/or in our world. Either you know that what you are being told is pretty much scripted or you are a lemming worried more about your quotidian diversions than anything. What has driven me nuts this month is that the greatest proponents of race conscious laws, civil rights reform, and movements for black rights (an not inconsequently black solidarity) are Jews.
Some quick facts. After DuBoise left, the NAACP was run by Jews until 1977, over 60 years. The SPLC has been Jewish run forever and came under fire for not hiring blacks and offering hearty salaries to the East coast Jew elites. (Remember: P stands for poverty). The persecution of Marcus Garvey was almost totally Jewish as was much of the resistance to Malcolm X (solidarity is not their M.O.). Many of the Jews were associated with Soviet Bolsheviks and their speech bears striking resemblance to the tenants of early-stage Bolshevism. There is more out there, go to Michigan Law School for a class and you will hear all about how Jews saved everything from whites. Thank God for Michigan!
Well, as we sit in the world of the height of Jewish legal/cultural hegemony, I think that some organizations are getting too big for their britches. For example, in Indy, the Jewish organizations around here almost universally support cloning and stem-cell research not to mention abortion on demand. I believe that most people will for a small part see these issues as civil rights issues which has proved to be problemmatic for a socially conservative black population. "Aegrescit medendo" I say. Black leaders in the last 15 years or so have become uncomfortable with Jewish dominance of their movement and have since pushed for more black voices. (Like Kwase Mfume and Julian Bond). I welcome this as a push for solidarity amongst blacks which is sorely needed as minorities that have been used by the Jewish elite.
What I think this shows is that Jews supported civil rights not necessarily because of their identification with injustice, but rather because it offered them an opportunity to eschew a social order through law, litigation, and media. They were not welcomed universally but made a lot of money in areas of prostitution, pornography, and other "unclean" industries. That power was used to leverage the civil rights movement away from solidarity to democratic pluralism and tolerance-speak. (Look at what happened to Fr. Coughlin for a great example) That is just my theory, it is incomplete, but that I what I see at this point.
Now today, I see the SPLC, still Jewish, has just come out against some of the Catholic church's faithful sons and daughters. This has never been so overt and I am glad that the SPLC has found the chutzpah to show exactly what they are. They are people who really don't like traditional Catholics. They loved to see Chicago and Detroit fall into their present ethnic nonsense and get really nasty on abortion issues as Catholics are their number one foe. This is really what they want, to destabilize Christianity rooted in tradition and family. Read their "Dirty Dozen" list of dangerous anti-Semites. (The Remnant??? WTF?) I'd like to hear what you guys have to say about this.
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=719
Duebster
I am not black and never really identified with blacks all that much as a child and certainly never ever wanted to become a baptist preacher or rapper. (See Qahal for X-Dash merch). So for me, it is kind of an annoyance that there is all this talk about being black where I could easily spout off 100 facts regarding my particular Western European heritage that includes religious persecution under Bismark, nobility and title, Catholic orthodoxy, etc... that pound for pound outrivals anything I have ever heard come from black America. But that really isn't a problem because some of us have learned to deal with this phenomena from an early age. (I once was slated to wrestle a girl in high school but after I hurt another male opponent by wrenching his wrist, she forfeited, I was relieved).
Now in Indianapolis, the North of the north, I am constantly surrounded by attempts of people to make me aware that there are black people around me and that they are distinct. Fine, I see that and I notice them every time I go to work. I work with them and enjoy a collegial and friendly atmosphere of which many different races are a part. Things are fine, there is no elephant in the room.
Now, I won't go into the idiocy of the liberal education establishment to push white guilt to the point of totally obfuscating the serious moral depravity of a person like King. That is an either/or in our world. Either you know that what you are being told is pretty much scripted or you are a lemming worried more about your quotidian diversions than anything. What has driven me nuts this month is that the greatest proponents of race conscious laws, civil rights reform, and movements for black rights (an not inconsequently black solidarity) are Jews.
Some quick facts. After DuBoise left, the NAACP was run by Jews until 1977, over 60 years. The SPLC has been Jewish run forever and came under fire for not hiring blacks and offering hearty salaries to the East coast Jew elites. (Remember: P stands for poverty). The persecution of Marcus Garvey was almost totally Jewish as was much of the resistance to Malcolm X (solidarity is not their M.O.). Many of the Jews were associated with Soviet Bolsheviks and their speech bears striking resemblance to the tenants of early-stage Bolshevism. There is more out there, go to Michigan Law School for a class and you will hear all about how Jews saved everything from whites. Thank God for Michigan!
Well, as we sit in the world of the height of Jewish legal/cultural hegemony, I think that some organizations are getting too big for their britches. For example, in Indy, the Jewish organizations around here almost universally support cloning and stem-cell research not to mention abortion on demand. I believe that most people will for a small part see these issues as civil rights issues which has proved to be problemmatic for a socially conservative black population. "Aegrescit medendo" I say. Black leaders in the last 15 years or so have become uncomfortable with Jewish dominance of their movement and have since pushed for more black voices. (Like Kwase Mfume and Julian Bond). I welcome this as a push for solidarity amongst blacks which is sorely needed as minorities that have been used by the Jewish elite.
What I think this shows is that Jews supported civil rights not necessarily because of their identification with injustice, but rather because it offered them an opportunity to eschew a social order through law, litigation, and media. They were not welcomed universally but made a lot of money in areas of prostitution, pornography, and other "unclean" industries. That power was used to leverage the civil rights movement away from solidarity to democratic pluralism and tolerance-speak. (Look at what happened to Fr. Coughlin for a great example) That is just my theory, it is incomplete, but that I what I see at this point.
Now today, I see the SPLC, still Jewish, has just come out against some of the Catholic church's faithful sons and daughters. This has never been so overt and I am glad that the SPLC has found the chutzpah to show exactly what they are. They are people who really don't like traditional Catholics. They loved to see Chicago and Detroit fall into their present ethnic nonsense and get really nasty on abortion issues as Catholics are their number one foe. This is really what they want, to destabilize Christianity rooted in tradition and family. Read their "Dirty Dozen" list of dangerous anti-Semites. (The Remnant??? WTF?) I'd like to hear what you guys have to say about this.
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=719
Duebster
posted by Duebster95 at 10:18 AM
1 Comments:
I think you have a pretty interesting point. It would not be surprising that elite members of the Jewish community piggy-backed on the coattails of the civil rights movement, even to the point where they are now the "majority shareholder" if you will. Its hard to imagine the Jewish elite could have created the modern P.C. landscape on their own. For starters, I think that the black community is much larger. But also, the United States doesn't feel a sense of responsibility to the Jewish community. If anything, by fighting and winning WWII, it should be the other way around. Whereas, there is definitely the "white guilt", as you say, associated with the mistreatment of the black community. So much so that we are led to believe that it was the primary (and sometimes only) cause behind our Civil War. I mean, we killed our brothers over this, right? That's guilt. By tapping into that guilt, Jews, homosexuals, athiests, whatever, are able to gain momentum they probably wouldn't have had otherwise. (Ransom can probably treat us to some interesting facts on the homosexual agenda thanks to his brief stint with the ADF)
Anyway, like I said, its certainly possible, but regardless, it is what it is. Clearly there are groups that can freely toss out accusations without any basis or fear of public scrutiny. These would include pretty much everybody but Catholics and evangelical Protestants. (see John Edwards' bloggers)
The insanity of this whole situation is that to be truly Catholic is to necessarily admit that modern day Judaism is a lost religion. And what keeps people from the one, true Church: Sin and ignorance. And who is the source of these: Satan, the cause of all division. Just because lower level Masons love helping sick kids at their hospitals, doesn't mean that Satan isn't somehow involved at the highest levels of their organization. Just because Jews, Protestants, Mormons, Muslims, and others have charitable and virtuous members doesn't mean that at the very top or beginning of their faith that Satan isn't critically involved. To accept the Talmud or the Quran or the Book of Lies, I mean Mormon, is to reject Christ. And to reject Christ is to reject the Church.
So to say that I believe in the True Church, doesn't that necessarily imply that I also believe that all other "options", including modern Judaism, are tools of the devil. We would be crazy if we said we were Catholic and then didn't also believe that the devil was trying with all his might to foster a false institution to attack and replace the One, True Church.
I feel like people have this idea that the devil is some kind of "honest salesman" and his sales pitch is "How do you feel about burning for all eternity?" He's the father of lies, people. He presents a false good. For example. Sex is good, in marriage. The devil takes it out of marriage, but it is still sex. It drives me crazy when people of other faiths go around quoting, "You shall know them by their works." So because the Shriners have a bunch of children's hospitals, they must be "of God". Helping children is good, but not when it is for the purpose of building up the freemasons at the expense of the Church. I hope that's making sense. If you are using charity to build up institutions that are contrary to the Catholic Church than is it really charity?
I feel like this comes back to our previous discussion about ecumenism. The danger is equating our faith to everyone else's. That's what creeps me out about the Mormons. They try to pull that crap. While it may appear that we are doing the same thing, say tithing for example, we are in fact doing something totally different. I am giving to the true Church and they are supporting a false institution seeking to tear down the Church. Obviously I'm speaking objectively and I'm not intending to play judge here. I make no judgments on the individual's heart, but the objective reality is that such actions serve the work of the devil in tearing down the true Church.
As Catholics in the modern Church, especially in the U.S., we can easily fall into false ecumenism. Meaning that rather than engaging the world, we adopt it. We start accepting the SPLC's terms. I haven't read Nostra Aetate, but it doesn't surprise me that the Church condemned anti-semitism, as properly defined which is the equivalent of racism. That's true and just. But the SPLC and company have redefined anti-semitism. Now its telling Jews that they are wrong as a matter of faith and history, not that they are racially inferior, but that they are wrong to reject Christ as the Messiah. And if that is anti-semitism, then the Catholic Church is a raging anti-semitical institution, the likes of which this world will never see again. We can speak in a new, modern language, but we can't accept the world's definition of terms.
Post a Comment
<< Home